IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Paylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 46 3 4 7 0.152 0.0592 0.0604 0.2220 0.2267
2011-12 — AJHL 37 4 6 10 0.270 0.0903 0.0876 0.2509 0.2435
2012-13 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 35 6 3 9 0.257 0.0859 0.0790 0.2387 0.2194
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 — SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 — FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24537
Forward overall
#1073
Forward born in 1992
#2172
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Durham
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Menta
Nichols · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.