← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Paylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 46 3 4 7 0.152 0.0586 0.0598 0.2215 0.2261
2011-12 AJHL 37 4 6 10 0.270 0.0907 0.0880 0.2501 0.2427
2012-13 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 35 6 3 9 0.257 0.0862 0.0792 0.2379 0.2187
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#34530
Forward overall
#1307
Forward born in 1992
#1943
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.