| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.333 | 0.1284 | 0.1415 | 0.4851 | 0.5344 |
| 2012-13 | Battlefords North Stars | SJHL | 37 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.189 | 0.0485 | 0.0493 | 0.1426 | 0.1450 |
| 2013-14 | Battlefords North Stars | SJHL | 43 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.302 | 0.0774 | 0.0746 | 0.2279 | 0.2197 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.