← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Greenaway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1415 0.4851 0.5344
2012-13 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 37 3 4 7 0.189 0.0485 0.0493 0.1426 0.1450
2013-14 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 43 5 8 13 0.302 0.0774 0.0746 0.2279 0.2197
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#51675
Forward overall
#1963
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.