← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Milnthorp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 45 3 3 6 0.133 0.0447 0.0457 0.1234 0.1263
2011-12 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 4 15 19 0.328 0.1099 0.1069 0.3032 0.2949
2012-13 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 5 9 14 0.233 0.0782 0.0720 0.2159 0.1989
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA JR 28 5 11 16 0.571
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 1 11 12 0.462
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 2 8 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2013-14 · Marian
+356.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20935
Defenseman overall
#1994
Defenseman born in 1992
#2265
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.