← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damon Warren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0143 0.0143 0.0361 0.0361
2021-22 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 46 5 12 17 0.370 0.0464 0.0499 0.1167 0.1254
2022-23 Atlantic City Seals EHLP 41 18 24 42 1.024 0.1175 0.1176 0.2309 0.2311
2023-24 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 40 12 9 21 0.525 0.1213 0.1225 0.2569 0.2593
2024-25 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 45 22 23 45 1.000 0.2310 0.2213 0.4893 0.4688
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Westfield State
+28.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20131
Forward overall
#1076
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.