← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kennedy O'Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 36 2 2 4 0.111 0.0655 0.0655 0.3273 0.3273
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 56 2 4 6 0.107 0.0632 0.0571 0.3155 0.2850
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass D1 HockeyEast SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 UMass D1 HockeyEast 34 0 6 6 0.176
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 32 0 6 6 0.188
2023-24 UMass D1 HockeyEast 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 UMass D1 HockeyEast 21 0 2 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2022-23 · UMass
+76.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22745
Defenseman overall
#3280
Defenseman born in 2001
#4091
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.