IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Levandowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 28 23 51 1.889 0.5085 0.5085 0.4588 0.4588
2020-21 — USHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1844 0.1844 0.8839 0.8839
2021-22 — USHL 20 6 3 9 0.450 0.2766 0.2689 1.3258 1.2891
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 38 23 19 42 1.105 0.4379 0.4221 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 34 5 9 14 0.412
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 29 2 6 8 0.276
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Lake Superior State
-10.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13178
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2000-01
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Coby Downs
Norwich · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2008-09
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.