← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clint Levens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 34 0 3 3 0.088 0.0542 0.0542 0.2599 0.2599
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 9 8 17 0.293 0.1802 0.1818 0.8635 0.8710
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 10 9 19 0.328 0.2014 0.1927 0.9652 0.9235
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 35 5 9 14 0.400
2024-25 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 22 3 3 6 0.273
2023-24 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 24 0 3 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Providence
-22.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34704
Forward overall
#2117
Forward born in 2003
#3200
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.