← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Batchelder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 26 17 12 29 1.115 0.1374 0.1374 0.2709 0.2709
2020-21 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 34 26 60 2.500 0.3080 0.3080 1.9642 1.9642
2021-22 USHL 50 5 4 9 0.180 0.1062 0.1055 0.5303 0.5266
2022-23 USHL 31 5 6 11 0.355 0.2093 0.1970 1.0453 0.9837
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 34 5 10 15 0.441
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 26 3 4 7 0.269
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 34 8 7 15 0.441
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Lake Superior State
+221.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16889
Forward overall
#846
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.