IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Rubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.1537 0.1537 0.7366 0.7366
2021-22 — USHL 43 1 3 4 0.093 0.0572 0.0573 0.2740 0.2747
2022-23 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 4 23 27 0.500 0.1862 0.1811 0.7286 0.7088
2023-24 Coquitlam Express BCHL 52 5 21 26 0.500 0.1862 0.1726 0.7286 0.6754
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 36 3 5 8 0.222
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 31 1 6 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · Sacred Heart
+35.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9962
Defenseman overall
#2169
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Cann
Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.