IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Diego Cuglietta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-12 Country: Italy
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Merritt Centennials BCHL 44 4 16 20 0.455 0.1751 0.1901 0.6623 0.7189
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 53 19 37 56 1.057 0.4071 0.4231 1.5396 1.6001
2014-15 Merritt Centennials BCHL 52 17 35 52 1.000 0.3853 0.3825 1.4571 1.4464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 38 25 16 41 1.079
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 7 16 23 0.639
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 35 12 13 25 0.714
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 38 6 5 11 0.289
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Lake Superior State
-15.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12868
Forward overall
#521
Forward born in 1995
#466
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Cassells
Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.