IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Butcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 10 8 18 0.333 0.1297 0.1380 0.4861 0.5174
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 57 13 18 31 0.544 0.2117 0.2155 0.7932 0.8076
2014-15 — BCHL 56 9 27 36 0.643 0.2502 0.2431 0.9375 0.9109
2015-16 — BCHL 51 13 14 27 0.529 0.2060 0.1891 0.7720 0.7087
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 19 2 5 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+104.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17647
Forward overall
#669
Forward born in 1995
#1551
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Schlifke
Fredonia · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.