← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Butcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 10 8 18 0.333 0.1284 0.1367 0.4851 0.5163
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 57 13 18 31 0.544 0.2096 0.2134 0.7915 0.8059
2014-15 BCHL 56 9 27 36 0.643 0.2477 0.2407 0.9356 0.9090
2015-16 BCHL 51 13 14 27 0.529 0.2040 0.1873 0.7704 0.7072
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2018-19 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2018-19 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 26 4 12 16 0.615
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 19 2 5 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+106.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26619
Forward overall
#1024
Forward born in 1995
#1425
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.