IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Coughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-19 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #130  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Vernon Vipers BCHL 53 18 27 45 0.849 0.3272 0.3254 1.2357 1.2289
2014-15 Vernon Vipers BCHL 54 20 40 60 1.111 0.4281 0.4058 1.6170 1.5327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 29 6 11 17 0.586
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 34 6 10 16 0.471
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 31 3 8 11 0.355
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 35 3 9 12 0.343
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2015-16 · Vermont
+7.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10672
Forward overall
#470
Forward born in 1994
#310
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Skelly
Adrian · 2006-07
1.655 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.