IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Tracey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 49 12 14 26 0.531 0.2044 0.2142 0.7710 0.8080
2014-15 — BCHL 43 7 8 15 0.349 0.1344 0.1346 0.5068 0.5075
2015-16 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.0702 0.0686 0.2056 0.2009
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wentworth D1 CNE SR 27 10 19 29 1.074
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 27 10 19 29 1.074
2018-19 Wentworth D1 CNE JR 26 10 14 24 0.923
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 26 10 14 24 0.923
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2016-17 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 15 1 4 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2016-17 · Wentworth
+310.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43049
Forward overall
#1843
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Greenberg
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hadan Jordan
St. Michael's College · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Coby Downs
Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.