IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Edwin Hookenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-10-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Estevan Bruins SJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 51 4 7 11 0.216 0.0831 0.0870 0.3139 0.3288
2014-15 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 58 5 23 28 0.483 0.1860 0.1861 0.7026 0.7031
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 58 6 17 23 0.397 0.1528 0.1447 0.5772 0.5467
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 38 3 10 13 0.342
2018-19 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 42 3 7 10 0.238
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11579
Defenseman overall
#1577
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Bacallao
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.