IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Citron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Vernon Vipers BCHL 54 1 6 7 0.130 0.0499 0.0509 0.1886 0.1925
2014-15 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 2 15 17 0.327 0.1260 0.1227 0.4757 0.4633
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC — 34 1 2 3 0.088
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC — 37 0 3 3 0.081
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC — 33 0 4 4 0.121
2015-16 Colgate D1 ECAC — 35 2 3 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2015-16 · Colgate
+61.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18536
Defenseman overall
#2119
Defenseman born in 1995
#2774
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin O'Donnell
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bud Winter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.