IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin O'Donnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 31 1 5 6 0.194 0.0767 0.0783 0.2032 0.2075
2009-10 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 16 13 29 0.500 0.1981 0.1944 0.5250 0.5151
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 24 12 13 25 1.042
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — JR 27 12 12 24 0.889
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 27 6 13 19 0.704
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 27 10 15 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Stout
+630.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36994
Forward overall
#1336
Forward born in 1990
#3847
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pentecost
Curry · 2004-05
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Balvin
Bethel · 2003-04
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.