← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Welsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 3 8 11 0.367 0.0726 0.0726 0.1671 0.1671
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 USHL 48 4 4 8 0.167 0.0983 0.1018 0.5007 0.5186
2022-23 BCHL 32 2 7 9 0.281 0.1083 0.1089 0.4092 0.4116
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA 36 8 8 16 0.444
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA 33 0 3 3 0.091
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2023-24 · Holy Cross
-15.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45992
Forward overall
#3090
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.