| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | NAHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 53 | 4 | 18 | 22 | 0.415 | 0.1645 | 0.1645 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Fargo Force | USHL | 62 | 3 | 18 | 21 | 0.339 | 0.2082 | 0.2010 | 0.9979 | 0.9634 |
| 2022-23 | Fargo Force | USHL | 58 | 7 | 17 | 24 | 0.414 | 0.2544 | 0.2324 | 1.2191 | 1.1136 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 40 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.225 |
| 2025-26 | Minnesota State | D1 | CCHA | JR | 40 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.225 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | SR | 37 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.135 |
| 2023-24 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | JR | 27 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.148 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.