IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Santerno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 53 12 12 24 0.453 0.1745 0.1808 0.6590 0.6827
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 56 13 13 26 0.464 0.1789 0.1758 0.6757 0.6639
2016-17 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 57 33 31 64 1.123 0.4326 0.4029 1.6340 1.5218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 31 12 5 17 0.548
2020-21 Bentley D1 AHA SR 15 5 11 16 1.067
2019-20 Bentley D1 AHA JR 36 6 17 23 0.639
2018-19 Bentley D1 AHA SO 37 11 25 36 0.973
2017-18 Bentley D1 AHA FR 35 12 18 30 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2017-18 · Bentley
+220.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17671
Forward overall
#686
Forward born in 1996
#763
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.