IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Udahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 48 9 10 19 0.396 0.1525 0.1525 0.5751 0.5751
2015-16 Coquitlam Express BCHL 33 7 4 11 0.333 0.1284 0.1284 0.4843 0.4843
2016-17 Coquitlam Express BCHL 11 3 6 9 0.818 0.3153 0.3153 1.1889 1.1889
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE JR 25 12 6 18 0.720
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 25 12 6 18 0.720
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE SO 16 5 3 8 0.500
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 16 5 3 8 0.500
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 30 14 9 23 0.767
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+272.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26544
Forward overall
#1423
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.