← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Therrien Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 58 6 11 17 0.293 0.0979 0.0992 0.2721 0.2757
2013-14 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 59 11 18 29 0.491 0.1642 0.1579 0.4563 0.4387
2014-15 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 30 1 9 10 0.333 0.1297 0.1193 0.4861 0.4472
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 JR 23 3 2 5 0.217
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 20 5 2 7 0.350
2016-17 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SO 20 5 2 7 0.350
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2015-16 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2015-16 · Concordia
+97.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27802
Forward overall
#1129
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.