← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braydon Barker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.3725 0.3956 1.4571 1.5473
2015-16 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 45 2 7 9 0.200 0.0664 0.0666 0.1854 0.1861
2016-17 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 38 4 7 11 0.289 0.0961 0.0918 0.2683 0.2562
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 21 1 24 25 1.190
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D1 SR 21 1 24 25 1.190
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 SR 21 1 24 25 1.190
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 6 28 34 1.417
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D1 JR 24 6 28 34 1.417
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 JR 24 6 28 34 1.417
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D1 SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 6 18 24 0.960
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 FR 25 6 18 24 0.960
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2017-18 · Concordia
+1271.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50112
Forward overall
#2359
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2011-12
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.