IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Boschetto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 36 21 13 34 0.944 0.0704 0.0704 0.2164 0.2164
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 42 29 26 55 1.310 0.0851 0.0841 0.2949 0.2913
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 46 15 26 41 0.891 0.1304 0.1298 0.4370 0.4350
2023-24 Seacoast Spartans EHL 44 11 19 30 0.682 0.0997 0.0942 0.3343 0.3159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 22 2 0 2 0.091
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast — 21 3 3 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Keene State
+207.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19313
Forward overall
#988
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carmine Alberga
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Arendes
Stevenson · 2024-25
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Dale
Utica · 2004-05
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.