← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Boschetto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 36 21 13 34 0.944 0.0872 0.0872 0.2163 0.2163
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 42 29 26 55 1.310 0.1502 0.1484 0.2952 0.2916
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 46 15 26 41 0.891 0.2059 0.2050 0.4361 0.4341
2023-24 Seacoast Spartans EHL 44 11 19 30 0.682 0.1575 0.1488 0.3336 0.3153
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SO 22 2 0 2 0.091
2024-25 Keene State D3 LittleEast 21 3 3 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Keene State
+94.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19847
Forward overall
#1027
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2024-25
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.