IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 48 11 13 24 0.500 0.1677 0.1889 0.4626 0.5211
2013-14 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 52 41 31 72 1.385 0.4644 0.4990 1.2810 1.3764
2015-16 Penticton Vees BCHL 42 21 42 63 1.500 0.5779 0.5660 2.1816 2.1368
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 25 37 62 1.069 0.4119 0.3824 1.5548 1.4434
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 26 9 11 20 0.769
2017-18 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 34 15 15 30 0.882
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 26 1 5 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2014-15 · Ohio State
-28.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6951
Forward overall
#322
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Panzeca
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.