← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 28 18 11 29 1.036 0.1311 0.1311 0.2516 0.2516
2020-21 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 21 13 19 32 1.524 0.1929 0.1929
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 28 23 24 47 1.679 0.2125 0.2125 0.4077 0.4077
2022-23 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 49 13 19 32 0.653 0.2516 0.2493 0.9505 0.9418
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 47 16 17 33 0.702 0.2705 0.2556 1.0218 0.9656
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA 35 7 9 16 0.457
2024-25 Army D1 AHA 38 7 5 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Army
+45.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16189
Forward overall
#804
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.