← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 28 18 11 29 1.036 0.2788 0.2788 0.2516 0.2516
2020-21 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 21 13 19 32 1.524 0.4102 0.4102
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 28 23 24 47 1.679 0.4519 0.4519 0.4077 0.4077
2022-23 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 49 13 19 32 0.653 0.2433 0.2411 0.9516 0.9429
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 47 16 17 33 0.702 0.2615 0.2471 1.0230 0.9667
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA 35 7 9 16 0.457
2024-25 Army D1 AHA 38 7 5 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Army
+50.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15799
Forward overall
#782
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.