← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Elias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maple Grove USHS-MN 31 6 12 18 0.581 0.0735 0.0735 0.1410 0.1410
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 57 3 14 17 0.298 0.1759 0.1756 0.8956 0.8940
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 52 8 11 19 0.365 0.2155 0.2039 1.0974 1.0384
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 53 2 11 13 0.245 0.1447 0.1297 0.7367 0.6605
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 30 1 14 15 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+232.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8049
Defenseman overall
#1849
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.