← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden Tuck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 5 22 27 0.482 0.1858 0.1898 0.7016 0.7168
2017-18 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 51 19 19 38 0.745 0.2871 0.2795 1.0843 1.0557
2018-19 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 57 15 28 43 0.754 0.2907 0.2673 1.0979 1.0097
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA GR 33 6 11 17 0.515
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 37 5 15 20 0.540
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 35 12 15 27 0.771
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 18 6 10 16 0.889
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 34 5 23 28 0.824
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2019-20 · Sacred Heart
+253.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20648
Forward overall
#994
Forward born in 1998
#1000
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.