← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bret Link Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 47 6 9 15 0.319 0.1172 0.1172 0.3368 0.3368
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 47 22 18 40 0.851 0.3127 0.3127 0.8983 0.8983
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 61 20 30 50 0.820 0.4835 0.4588 2.4619 2.3364
2022-23 Fargo Force USHL 61 26 29 55 0.902 0.5319 0.4771 2.7079 2.4291
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 36 7 10 17 0.472
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC SR 37 7 14 21 0.568
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 35 4 11 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2023-24 · Colorado College
+6.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6032
Forward overall
#267
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.