IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Modry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 34 2 9 11 0.324 0.1246 0.1321 0.4701 0.4985
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 58 0 11 11 0.190 0.0731 0.0740 0.2757 0.2791
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 58 3 22 25 0.431 0.1661 0.1592 0.6263 0.6003
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 27 4 19 23 0.852
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 26 4 15 19 0.731
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 26 0 3 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2019-20 · Merrimack
-2.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13799
Defenseman overall
#2375
Defenseman born in 1999
#2376
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Kishko
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dean Balsamo
Adrian · 2015-16
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2013-14
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.