IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Osik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — BCHL 30 6 4 10 0.333 0.1284 0.1309 0.4851 0.4946
2017-18 South Shore Kings NCDC 50 20 36 56 1.120 0.4566 0.4510 0.9003 0.8892
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA — 14 1 4 5 0.357
2020-21 LIU D1 — SR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2020-21 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2019-20 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10085
Forward overall
#444
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2017-18
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.