IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Schiavon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Surrey Eagles BCHL 52 3 8 11 0.211 0.0815 0.0884 0.3078 0.3337
2018-19 Surrey Eagles BCHL 44 3 18 21 0.477 0.1839 0.1895 0.6946 0.7156
2019-20 — BCHL 47 9 21 30 0.638 0.2459 0.2459 0.9289 0.9289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA — 34 2 0 2 0.059
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA — 28 3 5 8 0.286
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA — 26 1 6 7 0.269
2021-22 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 27 0 4 4 0.148
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Vermont
+136.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7985
Defenseman overall
#1569
Defenseman born in 2000
#1733
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ken McLean
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2013-14
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Pehrkon
Babson · 2024-25
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.