← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-22 Country: USA
2023 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #19  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 27 7 29 36 1.333 0.3589 0.3589 0.3239 0.3239
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 19 17 21 38 2.000 0.5384 0.5384 0.4858 0.4858
2021-22 NTDP-U18 54 26 20 46 0.852 0.6606 0.6701 3.1707 3.2162
2022-23 NTDP-U18 61 31 44 75 1.230 0.9534 0.9169 4.5761 4.4007
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 38 12 21 33 0.868
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen 39 9 24 33 0.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.81
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2023-24 · Minnesota
+3.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.97 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.