← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-22 Country: USA
2023 · Round 1, Pick #19  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 27 7 29 36 1.333 0.1688 0.1688 0.3239 0.3239
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 19 17 21 38 2.000 0.2532 0.2532 0.4858 0.4858
2021-22 NTDP-U18 54 26 20 46 0.852 0.6332 0.6423 3.1788 3.2244
2022-23 NTDP-U18 61 31 44 75 1.230 0.9139 0.8789 4.5878 4.4120
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen 38 12 21 33 0.868
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen 39 9 24 33 0.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.78
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2023-24 · Minnesota
+8.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
85%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.