← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Anhorn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 58 5 20 25 0.431 0.1605 0.1624 0.6280 0.6356
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 53 5 22 27 0.509 0.1898 0.1819 0.7422 0.7112
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC 38 6 27 33 0.868
2022-23 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC 23 5 20 25 1.087
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC 29 7 13 20 0.690
2020-21 Union D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Union D1 ECAC FR 37 6 10 16 0.432
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Union
+163.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8176
Defenseman overall
#1714
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.