IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Vanuden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 34 9 10 19 0.559 0.2175 0.2087 0.8149 0.7820
2018-19 — BCHL 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0898 0.0813 0.3366 0.3049
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 27 12 10 22 0.815
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 23 5 5 10 0.435
2020-21 Finlandia D3 — SO 8 2 4 6 0.750
2019-20 Finlandia D3 — FR 25 3 4 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2019-20 · Finlandia
+147.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29025
Forward overall
#1228
Forward born in 1998
#2487
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor MacLean
Wisconsin-Superior · 2018-19
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Favaro
Curry · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theoren Tydingo
Wesleyan · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.