← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor MacLean Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 53 13 26 39 0.736 0.2126 0.2270 0.5539 0.5915
2016-17 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 43 9 18 27 0.628 0.1814 0.1847 0.4727 0.4813
2018-19 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 20 6 5 11 0.550 0.1589 0.1463 0.4140 0.3811
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 19 4 3 7 0.368
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 12 2 1 3 0.250
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 20 5 6 11 0.550
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Superior
+297.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23150
Forward overall
#937
Forward born in 1998
#737
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.