← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Penna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 42 4 26 30 0.714 0.1549 0.1482 0.5527 0.5288
2024-25 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 49 5 52 57 1.163 0.2523 0.2300 0.9000 0.8205
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2025-26 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 27 1 6 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2025-26 · Concordia
+39.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2992
Defenseman overall
#716
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2016-17
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.