← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Penna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 42 4 26 30 0.714 0.2281 0.2182 0.5529 0.5290
2024-25 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 49 5 52 57 1.163 0.3714 0.3386 0.9005 0.8209
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC 27 1 6 7 0.259
2025-26 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 27 1 6 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2025-26 · Concordia
-5.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2839
Defenseman overall
#697
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.