← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Cunningham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 40 2 2 4 0.100 0.0385 0.0434 0.1455 0.1639
2018-19 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 47 8 6 14 0.298 0.1148 0.1231 0.4335 0.4649
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 53 26 18 44 0.830 0.3199 0.3199 1.2082 1.2082
2020-21 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 20 3 8 11 0.550 0.2119 0.2119 0.8004 0.8004
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 51 10 21 31 0.608 0.2342 0.2159 0.8845 0.8153
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · SUNY Geneseo
+45.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22913
Forward overall
#1143
Forward born in 2001
#1173
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.