← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Richey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1297 0.1395 0.4861 0.5228
2018-19 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.1012 0.1034 0.3792 0.3874
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.0963 0.0963 0.2509 0.2509
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA SR 22 3 4 7 0.318
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA JR 27 4 4 8 0.296
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA SO 24 7 3 10 0.417
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA FR 18 4 10 14 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2020-21 · Marian
+670.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37817
Forward overall
#1616
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2002-03
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.