IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Antonacci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Maine Nordiques NAHL 21 1 3 4 0.191 0.0677 0.0677 0.2000 0.2000
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 54 5 19 24 0.444 0.1579 0.1579 0.4666 0.4666
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 61 5 18 23 0.377 0.2224 0.2181 1.1107 1.0892
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 24 0 1 1 0.042
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 30 2 2 4 0.133
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 37 0 5 5 0.135
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 36 3 9 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Maine
+61.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8088
Defenseman overall
#1867
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2008-09
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.