← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Darby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0578 0.0618 0.2183 0.2334
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 48 1 6 7 0.146 0.0562 0.0562 0.2122 0.2122
2020-21 Surrey Eagles BCHL 17 2 11 13 0.765 0.2946 0.2946 1.1129 1.1129
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 48 4 21 25 0.521 0.2007 0.1844 0.7579 0.6963
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
-39.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7387
Defenseman overall
#1566
Defenseman born in 2001
#1636
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.