IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Deckhut Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 4 7 11 0.393 0.1108 0.1108 0.1798 0.1798
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 58 4 18 22 0.379 0.2332 0.2211 1.1175 1.0595
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 61 13 31 44 0.721 0.4434 0.3973 2.1251 1.9043
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen GR 33 3 3 6 0.182
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 37 6 8 14 0.378
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 29 3 3 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Ohio State
-26.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15576
Forward overall
#814
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Master
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathew Thompson
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.