IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivier Gauthier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 18 21 39 0.639 0.1387 0.1405 0.4946 0.5010
2018-19 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 13 13 26 0.448 0.1727 0.1673 0.6524 0.6321
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 17 26 43 0.741 0.2857 0.2857 1.0790 1.0790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Niagara D1 AHA — 39 4 10 14 0.359
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA — 40 11 6 17 0.425
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA — 33 1 4 5 0.151
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24748
Forward overall
#1245
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Everson
Utica · 2015-16
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Faucher
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2017-18
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.