← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Scoville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 USPHL-Premier 25 6 19 25 1.000 0.3296 0.3385 0.3402 0.3494
2018-19 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 1 9 10 0.196 0.0730 0.0706 0.2857 0.2763
2019-20 Langley Rivermen BCHL 49 3 18 21 0.429 0.1597 0.1597 0.6245 0.6245
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC SR 31 4 20 24 0.774
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC JR 30 9 24 33 1.100
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC SO 29 0 16 16 0.552
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC FR 29 5 12 17 0.586
2020-21 Alabama Huntsville D1 FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2020-21 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2020-21 · Alabama Huntsville
-18.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8757
Defenseman overall
#1788
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.