← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolas Sombrowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 7 1 3 4 0.571 0.2128 0.2251 0.8326 0.8807
2019-20 SJHL 46 7 7 14 0.304 0.0927 0.0927 0.2255 0.2255
2020-21 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 18 3 3 6 0.333 0.1242 0.1242 0.4857 0.4857
2021-22 SJHL 55 16 22 38 0.691 0.2104 0.1939 0.5120 0.4718
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 19 6 3 9 0.474
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 22 6 7 13 0.591
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 24 6 12 18 0.750
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Wentworth
+117.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35535
Forward overall
#1930
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.