← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Tuba Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Coquitlam Express BCHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1926 0.2205 0.7277 0.8332
2019-20 Coquitlam Express BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Surrey Eagles BCHL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0593 0.0593 0.2238 0.2238
2021-22 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 38 3 15 18 0.474 0.1214 0.1225 0.3571 0.3602
2022-23 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 48 10 25 35 0.729 0.1868 0.1791 0.5497 0.5270
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Marian D3 NCHA GR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2024-25 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA JR 19 3 2 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2023-24 · Marian
+78.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9854
Defenseman overall
#2111
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2024-25
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.