← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Nieusma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 38 10 21 31 0.816 0.1098 0.1098 0.2777 0.2777
2021-22 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 16 38 54 1.227 0.1652 0.1530 0.4178 0.3868
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 1 6 7 0.259
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 10 1 1 2 0.200
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2022-23 · Lake Forest
+25.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7714
Defenseman overall
#1153
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.