IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Lamb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 62 8 11 19 0.306 0.1808 0.1905 0.9205 0.9701
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 57 9 13 22 0.386 0.2277 0.2281 1.1593 1.1615
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 60 8 4 12 0.200 0.1180 0.1124 0.6007 0.5720
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 36 7 5 12 0.333
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 33 2 8 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Mercyhurst
+123.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32570
Forward overall
#1968
Forward born in 2004
#3009
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devan Sheth
Assumption · 2016-17
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2009-10
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.