IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Lamb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 62 8 11 19 0.306 0.1884 0.1985 0.9030 0.9516
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 57 9 13 22 0.386 0.2373 0.2378 1.1372 1.1394
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 60 8 4 12 0.200 0.1229 0.1170 0.5892 0.5611
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 36 7 5 12 0.333
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 33 2 8 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Mercyhurst
+114.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32375
Forward overall
#1944
Forward born in 2004
#3036
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.