IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coalson Wolford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 49 11 10 21 0.429 0.1668 0.1668 0.6250 0.6250
2020-21 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 19 4 7 11 0.579 0.2253 0.2253 0.8442 0.8442
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 46 12 20 32 0.696 0.2708 0.2488 1.0145 0.9322
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 21 4 1 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+11.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16423
Forward overall
#554
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Valenti
Utica · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.