← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Shostak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 40 8 9 17 0.425 0.1583 0.1583 0.6193 0.6193
2020-21 Vernon Vipers BCHL 20 5 13 18 0.900 0.3352 0.3352 1.3114 1.3114
2021-22 Vernon Vipers BCHL 42 11 18 29 0.691 0.2572 0.2415 1.0061 0.9448
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 32 3 3 6 0.188
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 30 3 2 5 0.167
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC FR 29 5 2 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Brown
+16.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20007
Forward overall
#939
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.