← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Eddy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 45 4 8 12 0.267 0.0993 0.0993 0.3886 0.3886
2020-21 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 20 8 3 11 0.550 0.2049 0.2049 0.8014 0.8014
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 39 22 35 57 1.462 0.5444 0.5278 2.1296 2.0647
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 32 3 5 8 0.250
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast 36 5 5 10 0.278
2023-24 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 34 7 6 13 0.382
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 35 4 6 10 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Northern Michigan
-41.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12732
Forward overall
#634
Forward born in 2002
#488
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.